With the millions (billions?) of still and video cameras, either purpose built or part of cell phones, they worry about a few more government operated surveillance cameras and “fusion centers”.

YouTube and Facebook are existing searchable “fusion centers” that the government could only dream of replicating. Today I saw a clip, put up on YouTube of a gang of NY Giant (idiot) fans destroying a car in a parking lot, presumably because the Giants lost a playoff game. Some faces were clearly visible and, no doubt, law enforcement is working to identify the young fanatics.

The same holds true for those “lawful protests” against trade policies which turn into smashing and bashing of the property of others for no reason. Those events are also heavily covered by participants and put up on YouTube – “hey guys – look what we did”.

Mark my words, the ACLU will next claim that those whose job it is to protect life and property can't use publicly available clips from sites like YouTube, placed there by the “protesters” themselves.

Notice how they say nothing about a violation of civil rights when a video catches a law enforcement officer or public employee doing something wrong?

With the millions (billions?) of still and video cameras, either purpose built or part of cell phones, they worry about a few more government operated surveillance cameras and “fusion centers”.

YouTube and Facebook are existing searchable “fusion centers” that the government could only dream of replicating. Today I saw a clip, put up on YouTube of a gang of NY Giant (idiot) fans destroying a car in a parking lot, presumably because the Giants lost a playoff game. Some faces were clearly visible and, no doubt, law enforcement is working to identify the young fanatics.

The same holds true for those “lawful protests” against trade policies which turn into smashing and bashing of the property of others for no reason. Those events are also heavily covered by participants and put up on YouTube – “hey guys – look what we did”.

Mark my words, the ACLU will next claim that those whose job it is to protect life and property can't use publicly available clips from sites like YouTube, placed there by the “protesters” themselves.

Notice how they say nothing about a violation of civil rights when a video catches a law enforcement officer or public employee doing something wrong?

With the millions (billions?) of still and video cameras, either purpose built or part of cell phones, they worry about a few more government operated surveillance cameras and “fusion centers”.

YouTube and Facebook are existing searchable “fusion centers” that the government could only dream of replicating. Today I saw a clip, put up on YouTube of a gang of NY Giant (idiot) fans destroying a car in a parking lot, presumably because the Giants lost a playoff game. Some faces were clearly visible and, no doubt, law enforcement is working to identify the young fanatics.

The same holds true for those “lawful protests” against trade policies which turn into smashing and bashing of the property of others for no reason. Those events are also heavily covered by participants and put up on YouTube – “hey guys – look what we did”.

Mark my words, the ACLU will next claim that those whose job it is to protect life and property can't use publicly available clips from sites like YouTube, placed there by the “protesters” themselves.

Notice how they say nothing about a violation of civil rights when a video catches a law enforcement officer or public employee doing something wrong?

With the millions (billions?) of still and video cameras, either purpose built or part of cell phones, they worry about a few more government operated surveillance cameras and “fusion centers”.

YouTube and Facebook are existing searchable “fusion centers” that the government could only dream of replicating. Today I saw a clip, put up on YouTube of a gang of NY Giant (idiot) fans destroying a car in a parking lot, presumably because the Giants lost a playoff game. Some faces were clearly visible and, no doubt, law enforcement is working to identify the young fanatics.

The same holds true for those “lawful protests” against trade policies which turn into smashing and bashing of the property of others for no reason. Those events are also heavily covered by participants and put up on YouTube – “hey guys – look what we did”.

Mark my words, the ACLU will next claim that those whose job it is to protect life and property can't use publicly available clips from sites like YouTube, placed there by the “protesters” themselves.

Notice how they say nothing about a violation of civil rights when a video catches a law enforcement officer or public employee doing something wrong?