<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP poll on domestic partnerships bill misstates the facts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts</link>
	<description>New Mexico news and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix_Rising</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts#comment-23275</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix_Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=19552#comment-23275</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute. I&#039;m starting to think this may not be a series of unfortunate misstatements about the facts and the law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Isn&#039;t this whole show designed to dare the bill&#039;s sponsors to accept a DOMA?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Bill Sharer runs around for a few days with that Arizona lawyer&#039;s hand up his back, saying &#039;this is gay marriage&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) His next move is to make Cisco prove it&#039;s not just gay marriage by another name--by welding his Definition of Marriage bill (SB 162) into the DP bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Cisco can try to fight off that amendment, but the tactic has already put the Yes votes on the defensive--they have to show that they&#039;re not for &#039;gay marriage&#039; either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m betting that we can measure the purpose of the action by its results. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore I predict that by this time tomorrow, we have a DP bill that contains a DOMA being debated on the Senate floor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute. I&#39;m starting to think this may not be a series of unfortunate misstatements about the facts and the law.</p>
<p>Isn&#39;t this whole show designed to dare the bill&#39;s sponsors to accept a DOMA?</p>
<p>1) Bill Sharer runs around for a few days with that Arizona lawyer&#39;s hand up his back, saying &#39;this is gay marriage&#39;.</p>
<p>2) His next move is to make Cisco prove it&#39;s not just gay marriage by another name&#8211;by welding his Definition of Marriage bill (SB 162) into the DP bill.</p>
<p>3) Cisco can try to fight off that amendment, but the tactic has already put the Yes votes on the defensive&#8211;they have to show that they&#39;re not for &#39;gay marriage&#39; either.</p>
<p>I&#39;m betting that we can measure the purpose of the action by its results. </p>
<p>Therefore I predict that by this time tomorrow, we have a DP bill that contains a DOMA being debated on the Senate floor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix_Rising</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts#comment-23276</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix_Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=19552#comment-23276</guid>
		<description>Trip, are you suggesting that the NM GOP is telling lies to registered voters in an attempt to influence poll results?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That would be just shocking. It implies that Sen. Sharer knows that his honest opinion on the DP bill is unpopular. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It also makes him look like a heartless, ignorant puppet being pulled around by religious nuts from out of state...but that&#039;s another topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trip, are you suggesting that the NM GOP is telling lies to registered voters in an attempt to influence poll results?</p>
<p>That would be just shocking. It implies that Sen. Sharer knows that his honest opinion on the DP bill is unpopular. </p>
<p>It also makes him look like a heartless, ignorant puppet being pulled around by religious nuts from out of state&#8230;but that&#39;s another topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barbwire</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts#comment-23277</link>
		<dc:creator>barbwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=19552#comment-23277</guid>
		<description>Conflation is a right-wing art form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conflation is a right-wing art form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix_Rising</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts#comment-17648</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix_Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=19552#comment-17648</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute. I&#039;m starting to think this may not be a series of unfortunate misstatements about the facts and the law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Isn&#039;t this whole show designed to dare the bill&#039;s sponsors to accept a DOMA?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Bill Sharer runs around for a few days with that Arizona lawyer&#039;s hand up his back, saying &#039;this is gay marriage&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) His next move is to make Cisco prove it&#039;s not just gay marriage by another name--by welding his Definition of Marriage bill (SB 162) into the DP bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Cisco can try to fight off that amendment, but the tactic has already put the Yes votes on the defensive--they have to show that they&#039;re not for &#039;gay marriage&#039; either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m betting that we can measure the purpose of the action by its results. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore I predict that by this time tomorrow, we have a DP bill that contains a DOMA being debated on the Senate floor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute. I&#39;m starting to think this may not be a series of unfortunate misstatements about the facts and the law.</p>
<p>Isn&#39;t this whole show designed to dare the bill&#39;s sponsors to accept a DOMA?</p>
<p>1) Bill Sharer runs around for a few days with that Arizona lawyer&#39;s hand up his back, saying &#39;this is gay marriage&#39;.</p>
<p>2) His next move is to make Cisco prove it&#39;s not just gay marriage by another name&#8211;by welding his Definition of Marriage bill (SB 162) into the DP bill.</p>
<p>3) Cisco can try to fight off that amendment, but the tactic has already put the Yes votes on the defensive&#8211;they have to show that they&#39;re not for &#39;gay marriage&#39; either.</p>
<p>I&#39;m betting that we can measure the purpose of the action by its results. </p>
<p>Therefore I predict that by this time tomorrow, we have a DP bill that contains a DOMA being debated on the Senate floor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix_Rising</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts#comment-17649</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix_Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=19552#comment-17649</guid>
		<description>Trip, are you suggesting that the NM GOP is telling lies to registered voters in an attempt to influence poll results?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That would be just shocking. It implies that Sen. Sharer knows that his honest opinion on the DP bill is unpopular. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It also makes him look like a heartless, ignorant puppet being pulled around by religious nuts from out of state...but that&#039;s another topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trip, are you suggesting that the NM GOP is telling lies to registered voters in an attempt to influence poll results?</p>
<p>That would be just shocking. It implies that Sen. Sharer knows that his honest opinion on the DP bill is unpopular. </p>
<p>It also makes him look like a heartless, ignorant puppet being pulled around by religious nuts from out of state&#8230;but that&#39;s another topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix_Rising</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts#comment-10428</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix_Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=19552#comment-10428</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute. I&#039;m starting to think this may not be a series of unfortunate misstatements about the facts and the law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Isn&#039;t this whole show designed to dare the bill&#039;s sponsors to accept a DOMA?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Bill Sharer runs around for a few days with that Arizona lawyer&#039;s hand up his back, saying &#039;this is gay marriage&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) His next move is to make Cisco prove it&#039;s not just gay marriage by another name--by welding his Definition of Marriage bill (SB 162) into the DP bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Cisco can try to fight off that amendment, but the tactic has already put the Yes votes on the defensive--they have to show that they&#039;re not for &#039;gay marriage&#039; either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m betting that we can measure the purpose of the action by its results. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore I predict that by this time tomorrow, we have a DP bill that contains a DOMA being debated on the Senate floor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute. I&#39;m starting to think this may not be a series of unfortunate misstatements about the facts and the law.</p>
<p>Isn&#39;t this whole show designed to dare the bill&#39;s sponsors to accept a DOMA?</p>
<p>1) Bill Sharer runs around for a few days with that Arizona lawyer&#39;s hand up his back, saying &#39;this is gay marriage&#39;.</p>
<p>2) His next move is to make Cisco prove it&#39;s not just gay marriage by another name&#8211;by welding his Definition of Marriage bill (SB 162) into the DP bill.</p>
<p>3) Cisco can try to fight off that amendment, but the tactic has already put the Yes votes on the defensive&#8211;they have to show that they&#39;re not for &#39;gay marriage&#39; either.</p>
<p>I&#39;m betting that we can measure the purpose of the action by its results. </p>
<p>Therefore I predict that by this time tomorrow, we have a DP bill that contains a DOMA being debated on the Senate floor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix_Rising</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts#comment-10429</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix_Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=19552#comment-10429</guid>
		<description>Trip, are you suggesting that the NM GOP is telling lies to registered voters in an attempt to influence poll results?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That would be just shocking. It implies that Sen. Sharer knows that his honest opinion on the DP bill is unpopular. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It also makes him look like a heartless, ignorant puppet being pulled around by religious nuts from out of state...but that&#039;s another topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trip, are you suggesting that the NM GOP is telling lies to registered voters in an attempt to influence poll results?</p>
<p>That would be just shocking. It implies that Sen. Sharer knows that his honest opinion on the DP bill is unpopular. </p>
<p>It also makes him look like a heartless, ignorant puppet being pulled around by religious nuts from out of state&#8230;but that&#39;s another topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix_Rising</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts#comment-4313</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix_Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=19552#comment-4313</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute. I&#039;m starting to think this may not be a series of unfortunate misstatements about the facts and the law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Isn&#039;t this whole show designed to dare the bill&#039;s sponsors to accept a DOMA?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Bill Sharer runs around for a few days with that Arizona lawyer&#039;s hand up his back, saying &#039;this is gay marriage&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) His next move is to make Cisco prove it&#039;s not just gay marriage by another name--by welding his Definition of Marriage bill (SB 162) into the DP bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Cisco can try to fight off that amendment, but the tactic has already put the Yes votes on the defensive--they have to show that they&#039;re not for &#039;gay marriage&#039; either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m betting that we can measure the purpose of the action by its results. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore I predict that by this time tomorrow, we have a DP bill that contains a DOMA being debated on the Senate floor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute. I&#39;m starting to think this may not be a series of unfortunate misstatements about the facts and the law.</p>
<p>Isn&#39;t this whole show designed to dare the bill&#39;s sponsors to accept a DOMA?</p>
<p>1) Bill Sharer runs around for a few days with that Arizona lawyer&#39;s hand up his back, saying &#39;this is gay marriage&#39;.</p>
<p>2) His next move is to make Cisco prove it&#39;s not just gay marriage by another name&#8211;by welding his Definition of Marriage bill (SB 162) into the DP bill.</p>
<p>3) Cisco can try to fight off that amendment, but the tactic has already put the Yes votes on the defensive&#8211;they have to show that they&#39;re not for &#39;gay marriage&#39; either.</p>
<p>I&#39;m betting that we can measure the purpose of the action by its results. </p>
<p>Therefore I predict that by this time tomorrow, we have a DP bill that contains a DOMA being debated on the Senate floor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix_Rising</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts#comment-4310</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix_Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=19552#comment-4310</guid>
		<description>Trip, are you suggesting that the NM GOP is telling lies to registered voters in an attempt to influence poll results?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That would be just shocking. It implies that Sen. Sharer knows that his honest opinion on the DP bill is unpopular. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It also makes him look like a heartless, ignorant puppet being pulled around by religious nuts from out of state...but that&#039;s another topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trip, are you suggesting that the NM GOP is telling lies to registered voters in an attempt to influence poll results?</p>
<p>That would be just shocking. It implies that Sen. Sharer knows that his honest opinion on the DP bill is unpopular. </p>
<p>It also makes him look like a heartless, ignorant puppet being pulled around by religious nuts from out of state&#8230;but that&#39;s another topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barbwire</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/19552/gop-poll-on-domestic-partnerships-misstates-the-facts#comment-4309</link>
		<dc:creator>barbwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=19552#comment-4309</guid>
		<description>Conflation is a right-wing art form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conflation is a right-wing art form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

