“(Richardson) admitted his legacy factored into his calculus.”(1) The evidence is that is was “the” factor.

“(Richardson) acknowledged that he hoped his administration would be remembered for 'doing the right thing, making decisions on matters of conscience.' ” (1)

How did he do the right thing in a matter of conscience?

In a wealth of understatement, Gov. Richardson admits that some of the anti death penalty arguments he used may not be true: “I am not totally, totally convinced that every argument that I have just said to you is accurate,” he said.” (1)

The “fact” reasons he gave for ending the death penalty were and are easily contradicted. The governor had all the evidence necessary to show that, further enforcing that the repeal was all about the governor. (2)

In a matter of judgement that he called the “most difficult decision in my political life.”(3), one would hope that he had both the character and conscience to thoroughly vet all of the arguments. Here, he admits that he did not. The arguments he used may not be true: he is a liar and/or was irresponsibly and knowingly misinformed in making “the most difficult decision of his political life”.

But, why?

Gov. Richardson had seen his hopes for more national and international prominence go down in flames, with regard to the Commerce Secretary nomination debacle. Gov. Richardson may not have been fully up-front with the Obama administration, regarding a corruption investigation in New Mexico. Richardson withdrew his nomination.

The Governor and close cronies are in the eye of the storm, regarding the FBI investigation into the awarding of state contracts to political donors. The firestorm may affect the remainder of Governor Richardson's term and beyond. (3)

Hypocritically, when speaking of that ongoing investigation, Richardson states: “I have faith in the criminal justice process, and we must allow it to run its course.” (3)

Cynical US leaders know that they become heroes in parts of Europe, as well as with many liberals within the US, by ending the death penalty. It notches up their level of celebrity and increases their speaking engagements and fees.

“Richardson said he has long believed — and still does — that the death penalty was a “just punishment” in rare cases for the worst crimes.” He added, “. . . from a foreign policy perspective, the death penalty 'did not seem to me to be good moral leadership and good foreign policy.' ” (4)

It is impossible to reconcile the Governor's current, unchanged belief, that the death penalty is a “just punishment” but his getting rid of it is a sign of “moral leadership”. One does not show moral leadership or responsible policy choices by ending justice. Yet. Richardson admits that he did just that.

Justice would have been a much more honorable legacy.

It is much easier to reconcile the Governor's decision when based upon his personal self interest, a legacy of more international prominence, producing more speaking engagements and fees.

Governor Richardson cannot seek the governorship, again.

The Icon

Incarcerated felon, former Illinois Gov. George Ryan dishonestly, emptied that state's death row, prior to leaving office and prior to his trial.

Governors, prosecutors and victim's rights groups, among others, condemned his actions.

Did Ryan care? Of course not. He was politically dead in the US and, very likely, soon to be incarcerated – which he was.

Ryan is considered a hero by murderers and others opposed to the death penalty. Because of his action, in sparing incredibly depraved murderers, Ryan has been nominated, repeatedly, for a Nobel Peace Prize.

If Ryan gets out of prison, he can depend on speaking engagements and fees, based solely on his sparing murderers.

That is a much better deal than fading into history as just another disgraced, corrupt and penniless politician, whose actions resulted in innocent deaths and making Illinois a more dangerous place.

Legacy. Indeed.

copyright 2009 Dudley Sharp
Permission for distribution of this document, in whole or in part, is approved with proper attribution.

Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters
e-mail sharpjfa@aol.com, 713-622-5491,
Houston, Texas

Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS , VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.

A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally

(1) “Bill Richardson admits doubt about death-penalty decision”, Trip Jennings, The New Mexico Independent, 3/19/09.

(2) “SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: A Rebuttal to Governor Richards: Repeal of the Death Penalty in New Mexico” Dudley Sharp, 3/19/2009 5:48:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time;
Subject Title of email: “Rebuttal to Governor Richardson – Repeal of the Death Penalty in New Mexico”

(3) “Richardson Scandal Simmered in New Mexico”, Trip Jennings, The Washington Independent, 1/6/09 12:34 PM

(4) “New Mexico governor abolishes capital punishment”, by Deborah Baker, Associated Press, March 19, 2009; 12:27 PM

“(Richardson) admitted his legacy factored into his calculus.”(1) The evidence is that is was “the” factor.

“(Richardson) acknowledged that he hoped his administration would be remembered for 'doing the right thing, making decisions on matters of conscience.' ” (1)

How did he do the right thing in a matter of conscience?

In a wealth of understatement, Gov. Richardson admits that some of the anti death penalty arguments he used may not be true: “I am not totally, totally convinced that every argument that I have just said to you is accurate,” he said.” (1)

The “fact” reasons he gave for ending the death penalty were and are easily contradicted. The governor had all the evidence necessary to show that, further enforcing that the repeal was all about the governor. (2)

In a matter of judgement that he called the “most difficult decision in my political life.”(3), one would hope that he had both the character and conscience to thoroughly vet all of the arguments. Here, he admits that he did not. The arguments he used may not be true: he is a liar and/or was irresponsibly and knowingly misinformed in making “the most difficult decision of his political life”.

But, why?

Gov. Richardson had seen his hopes for more national and international prominence go down in flames, with regard to the Commerce Secretary nomination debacle. Gov. Richardson may not have been fully up-front with the Obama administration, regarding a corruption investigation in New Mexico. Richardson withdrew his nomination.

The Governor and close cronies are in the eye of the storm, regarding the FBI investigation into the awarding of state contracts to political donors. The firestorm may affect the remainder of Governor Richardson's term and beyond. (3)

Hypocritically, when speaking of that ongoing investigation, Richardson states: “I have faith in the criminal justice process, and we must allow it to run its course.” (3)

Cynical US leaders know that they become heroes in parts of Europe, as well as with many liberals within the US, by ending the death penalty. It notches up their level of celebrity and increases their speaking engagements and fees.

“Richardson said he has long believed — and still does — that the death penalty was a “just punishment” in rare cases for the worst crimes.” He added, “. . . from a foreign policy perspective, the death penalty 'did not seem to me to be good moral leadership and good foreign policy.' ” (4)

It is impossible to reconcile the Governor's current, unchanged belief, that the death penalty is a “just punishment” but his getting rid of it is a sign of “moral leadership”. One does not show moral leadership or responsible policy choices by ending justice. Yet. Richardson admits that he did just that.

Justice would have been a much more honorable legacy.

It is much easier to reconcile the Governor's decision when based upon his personal self interest, a legacy of more international prominence, producing more speaking engagements and fees.

Governor Richardson cannot seek the governorship, again.

The Icon

Incarcerated felon, former Illinois Gov. George Ryan dishonestly, emptied that state's death row, prior to leaving office and prior to his trial.

Governors, prosecutors and victim's rights groups, among others, condemned his actions.

Did Ryan care? Of course not. He was politically dead in the US and, very likely, soon to be incarcerated – which he was.

Ryan is considered a hero by murderers and others opposed to the death penalty. Because of his action, in sparing incredibly depraved murderers, Ryan has been nominated, repeatedly, for a Nobel Peace Prize.

If Ryan gets out of prison, he can depend on speaking engagements and fees, based solely on his sparing murderers.

That is a much better deal than fading into history as just another disgraced, corrupt and penniless politician, whose actions resulted in innocent deaths and making Illinois a more dangerous place.

Legacy. Indeed.

copyright 2009 Dudley Sharp
Permission for distribution of this document, in whole or in part, is approved with proper attribution.

Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters
e-mail sharpjfa@aol.com, 713-622-5491,
Houston, Texas

Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS , VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.

A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally

(1) “Bill Richardson admits doubt about death-penalty decision”, Trip Jennings, The New Mexico Independent, 3/19/09.

(2) “SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: A Rebuttal to Governor Richards: Repeal of the Death Penalty in New Mexico” Dudley Sharp, 3/19/2009 5:48:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time;
Subject Title of email: “Rebuttal to Governor Richardson – Repeal of the Death Penalty in New Mexico”

(3) “Richardson Scandal Simmered in New Mexico”, Trip Jennings, The Washington Independent, 1/6/09 12:34 PM

(4) “New Mexico governor abolishes capital punishment”, by Deborah Baker, Associated Press, March 19, 2009; 12:27 PM

“(Richardson) admitted his legacy factored into his calculus.”(1) The evidence is that is was “the” factor.

“(Richardson) acknowledged that he hoped his administration would be remembered for 'doing the right thing, making decisions on matters of conscience.' ” (1)

How did he do the right thing in a matter of conscience?

In a wealth of understatement, Gov. Richardson admits that some of the anti death penalty arguments he used may not be true: “I am not totally, totally convinced that every argument that I have just said to you is accurate,” he said.” (1)

The “fact” reasons he gave for ending the death penalty were and are easily contradicted. The governor had all the evidence necessary to show that, further enforcing that the repeal was all about the governor. (2)

In a matter of judgement that he called the “most difficult decision in my political life.”(3), one would hope that he had both the character and conscience to thoroughly vet all of the arguments. Here, he admits that he did not. The arguments he used may not be true: he is a liar and/or was irresponsibly and knowingly misinformed in making “the most difficult decision of his political life”.

But, why?

Gov. Richardson had seen his hopes for more national and international prominence go down in flames, with regard to the Commerce Secretary nomination debacle. Gov. Richardson may not have been fully up-front with the Obama administration, regarding a corruption investigation in New Mexico. Richardson withdrew his nomination.

The Governor and close cronies are in the eye of the storm, regarding the FBI investigation into the awarding of state contracts to political donors. The firestorm may affect the remainder of Governor Richardson's term and beyond. (3)

Hypocritically, when speaking of that ongoing investigation, Richardson states: “I have faith in the criminal justice process, and we must allow it to run its course.” (3)

Cynical US leaders know that they become heroes in parts of Europe, as well as with many liberals within the US, by ending the death penalty. It notches up their level of celebrity and increases their speaking engagements and fees.

“Richardson said he has long believed — and still does — that the death penalty was a “just punishment” in rare cases for the worst crimes.” He added, “. . . from a foreign policy perspective, the death penalty 'did not seem to me to be good moral leadership and good foreign policy.' ” (4)

It is impossible to reconcile the Governor's current, unchanged belief, that the death penalty is a “just punishment” but his getting rid of it is a sign of “moral leadership”. One does not show moral leadership or responsible policy choices by ending justice. Yet. Richardson admits that he did just that.

Justice would have been a much more honorable legacy.

It is much easier to reconcile the Governor's decision when based upon his personal self interest, a legacy of more international prominence, producing more speaking engagements and fees.

Governor Richardson cannot seek the governorship, again.

The Icon

Incarcerated felon, former Illinois Gov. George Ryan dishonestly, emptied that state's death row, prior to leaving office and prior to his trial.

Governors, prosecutors and victim's rights groups, among others, condemned his actions.

Did Ryan care? Of course not. He was politically dead in the US and, very likely, soon to be incarcerated – which he was.

Ryan is considered a hero by murderers and others opposed to the death penalty. Because of his action, in sparing incredibly depraved murderers, Ryan has been nominated, repeatedly, for a Nobel Peace Prize.

If Ryan gets out of prison, he can depend on speaking engagements and fees, based solely on his sparing murderers.

That is a much better deal than fading into history as just another disgraced, corrupt and penniless politician, whose actions resulted in innocent deaths and making Illinois a more dangerous place.

Legacy. Indeed.

copyright 2009 Dudley Sharp
Permission for distribution of this document, in whole or in part, is approved with proper attribution.

Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters
e-mail sharpjfa@aol.com, 713-622-5491,
Houston, Texas

Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS , VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.

A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally

(1) “Bill Richardson admits doubt about death-penalty decision”, Trip Jennings, The New Mexico Independent, 3/19/09.

(2) “SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: A Rebuttal to Governor Richards: Repeal of the Death Penalty in New Mexico” Dudley Sharp, 3/19/2009 5:48:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time;
Subject Title of email: “Rebuttal to Governor Richardson – Repeal of the Death Penalty in New Mexico”

(3) “Richardson Scandal Simmered in New Mexico”, Trip Jennings, The Washington Independent, 1/6/09 12:34 PM

(4) “New Mexico governor abolishes capital punishment”, by Deborah Baker, Associated Press, March 19, 2009; 12:27 PM