Comments on: Kaweshtima (a.k.a. Mount Taylor) gains temporary protection http://newmexicoindependent.com/28964/kaweshtima-aka-mt-taylor-gains-temporary-protection New Mexico news and politics Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:15:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Kawazu http://newmexicoindependent.com/28964/kaweshtima-aka-mt-taylor-gains-temporary-protection#comment-21467 Kawazu Sun, 14 Jun 2009 03:33:26 +0000 http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=28964#comment-21467 Unfortunately your statement : "Once designated a TCP, a site is protected from new development." is not true. The State Cultural Properties Act trigger consultations with the SHPO on State permitting actions, but does not provide for preservation of listed properties. It is possible for mining permits to be issued after consultations between SHPO and Tribes. <br><br>Mt. Taylor has not gained protection only a listing. Unfortunately your statement : “Once designated a TCP, a site is protected from new development.” is not true. The State Cultural Properties Act trigger consultations with the SHPO on State permitting actions, but does not provide for preservation of listed properties. It is possible for mining permits to be issued after consultations between SHPO and Tribes.

Mt. Taylor has not gained protection only a listing.

]]> By: Kawazu http://newmexicoindependent.com/28964/kaweshtima-aka-mt-taylor-gains-temporary-protection#comment-17932 Kawazu Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:33:26 +0000 http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=28964#comment-17932 Unfortunately your statement : "Once designated a TCP, a site is protected from new development." is not true. The State Cultural Properties Act trigger consultations with the SHPO on State permitting actions, but does not provide for preservation of listed properties. It is possible for mining permits to be issued after consultations between SHPO and Tribes. <br><br>Mt. Taylor has not gained protection only a listing. Unfortunately your statement : “Once designated a TCP, a site is protected from new development.” is not true. The State Cultural Properties Act trigger consultations with the SHPO on State permitting actions, but does not provide for preservation of listed properties. It is possible for mining permits to be issued after consultations between SHPO and Tribes.

Mt. Taylor has not gained protection only a listing.

]]> By: Kawazu http://newmexicoindependent.com/28964/kaweshtima-aka-mt-taylor-gains-temporary-protection#comment-9770 Kawazu Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:33:26 +0000 http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=28964#comment-9770 Unfortunately your statement : "Once designated a TCP, a site is protected from new development." is not true. The State Cultural Properties Act trigger consultations with the SHPO on State permitting actions, but does not provide for preservation of listed properties. It is possible for mining permits to be issued after consultations between SHPO and Tribes. <br><br>Mt. Taylor has not gained protection only a listing. Unfortunately your statement : “Once designated a TCP, a site is protected from new development.” is not true. The State Cultural Properties Act trigger consultations with the SHPO on State permitting actions, but does not provide for preservation of listed properties. It is possible for mining permits to be issued after consultations between SHPO and Tribes.

Mt. Taylor has not gained protection only a listing.

]]> By: Kawazu http://newmexicoindependent.com/28964/kaweshtima-aka-mt-taylor-gains-temporary-protection#comment-6399 Kawazu Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:33:26 +0000 http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=28964#comment-6399 Unfortunately your statement : "Once designated a TCP, a site is protected from new development." is not true. The State Cultural Properties Act trigger consultations with the SHPO on State permitting actions, but does not provide for preservation of listed properties. It is possible for mining permits to be issued after consultations between SHPO and Tribes. <br><br>Mt. Taylor has not gained protection only a listing. Unfortunately your statement : “Once designated a TCP, a site is protected from new development.” is not true. The State Cultural Properties Act trigger consultations with the SHPO on State permitting actions, but does not provide for preservation of listed properties. It is possible for mining permits to be issued after consultations between SHPO and Tribes.

Mt. Taylor has not gained protection only a listing.

]]>