<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Cement permit appears headed for approval</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval</link>
	<description>New Mexico news and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggna</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval#comment-21931</link>
		<dc:creator>ggna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=33368#comment-21931</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s also &quot;pretty difficult&quot; because the AQ Division quietly signed a &quot;compliance agreement&quot; with GCC to &quot;acknowledge&quot; their &quot;substantial efforts&quot; and &quot;significant improvements&quot; back in January 2009. Why it&#039;s called a compliance agreement is mysterious, since there&#039;s nothing GCC has to comply with besides what&#039;s already laid down in the regular Air Quality rules.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fugitive dust and the long history of equipment breakdown, exceeded operating hours, exceeded throughput, etc. are the main frustrations and these are definitely within the AQ Division&#039;s purview.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An important piece of information is how that plant got in there in the first place. Oral history from the residents of the neighborhood alleges that the zoning was changed without proper notification of the neighbors. If so, the system has already failed the neighborhood and paved the way for this inappropriate industrial expansion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The neighborhood has a history of getting screwed by the system. This is a moment where the Environmental Health Department could finally do the right thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Air Quality Division has the latitude to attach substantial conditions to the permit. Here&#039;s a case where, at the very least, fenceline monitoring should be mandated. There should be zero fugitive dust. Chunks of cement in the swamp cooler pan? Not cool. We&#039;ll see what the Division decides to do. Sure would be nice to be pleasantly surprised for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#39;s also &#8220;pretty difficult&#8221; because the AQ Division quietly signed a &#8220;compliance agreement&#8221; with GCC to &#8220;acknowledge&#8221; their &#8220;substantial efforts&#8221; and &#8220;significant improvements&#8221; back in January 2009. Why it&#39;s called a compliance agreement is mysterious, since there&#39;s nothing GCC has to comply with besides what&#39;s already laid down in the regular Air Quality rules.</p>
<p>Fugitive dust and the long history of equipment breakdown, exceeded operating hours, exceeded throughput, etc. are the main frustrations and these are definitely within the AQ Division&#39;s purview.</p>
<p>An important piece of information is how that plant got in there in the first place. Oral history from the residents of the neighborhood alleges that the zoning was changed without proper notification of the neighbors. If so, the system has already failed the neighborhood and paved the way for this inappropriate industrial expansion.</p>
<p>The neighborhood has a history of getting screwed by the system. This is a moment where the Environmental Health Department could finally do the right thing.</p>
<p>The Air Quality Division has the latitude to attach substantial conditions to the permit. Here&#39;s a case where, at the very least, fenceline monitoring should be mandated. There should be zero fugitive dust. Chunks of cement in the swamp cooler pan? Not cool. We&#39;ll see what the Division decides to do. Sure would be nice to be pleasantly surprised for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggna</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval#comment-18887</link>
		<dc:creator>ggna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=33368#comment-18887</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s also &quot;pretty difficult&quot; because the AQ Division quietly signed a &quot;compliance agreement&quot; with GCC to &quot;acknowledge&quot; their &quot;substantial efforts&quot; and &quot;significant improvements&quot; back in January 2009. Why it&#039;s called a compliance agreement is mysterious, since there&#039;s nothing GCC has to comply with besides what&#039;s already laid down in the regular Air Quality rules.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fugitive dust and the long history of equipment breakdown, exceeded operating hours, exceeded throughput, etc. are the main frustrations and these are definitely within the AQ Division&#039;s purview.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An important piece of information is how that plant got in there in the first place. Oral history from the residents of the neighborhood alleges that the zoning was changed without proper notification of the neighbors. If so, the system has already failed the neighborhood and paved the way for this inappropriate industrial expansion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The neighborhood has a history of getting screwed by the system. This is a moment where the Environmental Health Department could finally do the right thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Air Quality Division has the latitude to attach substantial conditions to the permit. Here&#039;s a case where, at the very least, fenceline monitoring should be mandated. There should be zero fugitive dust. Chunks of cement in the swamp cooler pan? Not cool. We&#039;ll see what the Division decides to do. Sure would be nice to be pleasantly surprised for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#39;s also &#8220;pretty difficult&#8221; because the AQ Division quietly signed a &#8220;compliance agreement&#8221; with GCC to &#8220;acknowledge&#8221; their &#8220;substantial efforts&#8221; and &#8220;significant improvements&#8221; back in January 2009. Why it&#39;s called a compliance agreement is mysterious, since there&#39;s nothing GCC has to comply with besides what&#39;s already laid down in the regular Air Quality rules.</p>
<p>Fugitive dust and the long history of equipment breakdown, exceeded operating hours, exceeded throughput, etc. are the main frustrations and these are definitely within the AQ Division&#39;s purview.</p>
<p>An important piece of information is how that plant got in there in the first place. Oral history from the residents of the neighborhood alleges that the zoning was changed without proper notification of the neighbors. If so, the system has already failed the neighborhood and paved the way for this inappropriate industrial expansion.</p>
<p>The neighborhood has a history of getting screwed by the system. This is a moment where the Environmental Health Department could finally do the right thing.</p>
<p>The Air Quality Division has the latitude to attach substantial conditions to the permit. Here&#39;s a case where, at the very least, fenceline monitoring should be mandated. There should be zero fugitive dust. Chunks of cement in the swamp cooler pan? Not cool. We&#39;ll see what the Division decides to do. Sure would be nice to be pleasantly surprised for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggna</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval#comment-10220</link>
		<dc:creator>ggna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=33368#comment-10220</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s also &quot;pretty difficult&quot; because the AQ Division quietly signed a &quot;compliance agreement&quot; with GCC to &quot;acknowledge&quot; their &quot;substantial efforts&quot; and &quot;significant improvements&quot; back in January 2009. Why it&#039;s called a compliance agreement is mysterious, since there&#039;s nothing GCC has to comply with besides what&#039;s already laid down in the regular Air Quality rules.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fugitive dust and the long history of equipment breakdown, exceeded operating hours, exceeded throughput, etc. are the main frustrations and these are definitely within the AQ Division&#039;s purview.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An important piece of information is how that plant got in there in the first place. Oral history from the residents of the neighborhood alleges that the zoning was changed without proper notification of the neighbors. If so, the system has already failed the neighborhood and paved the way for this inappropriate industrial expansion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The neighborhood has a history of getting screwed by the system. This is a moment where the Environmental Health Department could finally do the right thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Air Quality Division has the latitude to attach substantial conditions to the permit. Here&#039;s a case where, at the very least, fenceline monitoring should be mandated. There should be zero fugitive dust. Chunks of cement in the swamp cooler pan? Not cool. We&#039;ll see what the Division decides to do. Sure would be nice to be pleasantly surprised for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#39;s also &#8220;pretty difficult&#8221; because the AQ Division quietly signed a &#8220;compliance agreement&#8221; with GCC to &#8220;acknowledge&#8221; their &#8220;substantial efforts&#8221; and &#8220;significant improvements&#8221; back in January 2009. Why it&#39;s called a compliance agreement is mysterious, since there&#39;s nothing GCC has to comply with besides what&#39;s already laid down in the regular Air Quality rules.</p>
<p>Fugitive dust and the long history of equipment breakdown, exceeded operating hours, exceeded throughput, etc. are the main frustrations and these are definitely within the AQ Division&#39;s purview.</p>
<p>An important piece of information is how that plant got in there in the first place. Oral history from the residents of the neighborhood alleges that the zoning was changed without proper notification of the neighbors. If so, the system has already failed the neighborhood and paved the way for this inappropriate industrial expansion.</p>
<p>The neighborhood has a history of getting screwed by the system. This is a moment where the Environmental Health Department could finally do the right thing.</p>
<p>The Air Quality Division has the latitude to attach substantial conditions to the permit. Here&#39;s a case where, at the very least, fenceline monitoring should be mandated. There should be zero fugitive dust. Chunks of cement in the swamp cooler pan? Not cool. We&#39;ll see what the Division decides to do. Sure would be nice to be pleasantly surprised for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggna</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval#comment-7794</link>
		<dc:creator>ggna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=33368#comment-7794</guid>
		<description>And it&#039;s also &quot;pretty difficult&quot; because the AQ Division quietly signed a &quot;compliance agreement&quot; with GCC to &quot;acknowledge&quot; their &quot;substantial efforts&quot; and &quot;significant improvements&quot; back in January 2009. Why it&#039;s called a compliance agreement is mysterious, since there&#039;s nothing GCC has to comply with besides what&#039;s already laid down in the regular Air Quality rules.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fugitive dust and the long history of equipment breakdown, exceeded operating hours, exceeded throughput, etc. are the main frustrations and these are definitely within the AQ Division&#039;s purview.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An important piece of information is how that plant got in there in the first place. Oral history from the residents of the neighborhood alleges that the zoning was changed without proper notification of the neighbors. If so, the system has already failed the neighborhood and paved the way for this inappropriate industrial expansion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The neighborhood has a history of getting screwed by the system. This is a moment where the Environmental Health Department could finally do the right thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Air Quality Division has the latitude to attach substantial conditions to the permit. Here&#039;s a case where, at the very least, fenceline monitoring should be mandated. There should be zero fugitive dust. Chunks of cement in the swamp cooler pan? Not cool. We&#039;ll see what the Division decides to do. Sure would be nice to be pleasantly surprised for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it&#39;s also &#8220;pretty difficult&#8221; because the AQ Division quietly signed a &#8220;compliance agreement&#8221; with GCC to &#8220;acknowledge&#8221; their &#8220;substantial efforts&#8221; and &#8220;significant improvements&#8221; back in January 2009. Why it&#39;s called a compliance agreement is mysterious, since there&#39;s nothing GCC has to comply with besides what&#39;s already laid down in the regular Air Quality rules.</p>
<p>Fugitive dust and the long history of equipment breakdown, exceeded operating hours, exceeded throughput, etc. are the main frustrations and these are definitely within the AQ Division&#39;s purview.</p>
<p>An important piece of information is how that plant got in there in the first place. Oral history from the residents of the neighborhood alleges that the zoning was changed without proper notification of the neighbors. If so, the system has already failed the neighborhood and paved the way for this inappropriate industrial expansion.</p>
<p>The neighborhood has a history of getting screwed by the system. This is a moment where the Environmental Health Department could finally do the right thing.</p>
<p>The Air Quality Division has the latitude to attach substantial conditions to the permit. Here&#39;s a case where, at the very least, fenceline monitoring should be mandated. There should be zero fugitive dust. Chunks of cement in the swamp cooler pan? Not cool. We&#39;ll see what the Division decides to do. Sure would be nice to be pleasantly surprised for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owinurame</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval#comment-7785</link>
		<dc:creator>Owinurame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=33368#comment-7785</guid>
		<description>Exactly - the entire process should be changed to consider the total impact and burden on the community.  From a resident&#039;s perspective, quality of life is air AND water, soil, noise, traffic and polluting businesses, AS WELL AS the current and historic rates of sickness and death, PLUS the availability and maintenance of services and amenities and property values.  All these things come together to create or detain a community&#039;s health and happiness - to allow the rule makers and enforcers to isolate each issue from the others is one more form of divide and conquer.&lt;br&gt;Does anybody believe that 4 times more particluate matter will IMPROVE the quality of life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly &#8211; the entire process should be changed to consider the total impact and burden on the community.  From a resident&#39;s perspective, quality of life is air AND water, soil, noise, traffic and polluting businesses, AS WELL AS the current and historic rates of sickness and death, PLUS the availability and maintenance of services and amenities and property values.  All these things come together to create or detain a community&#39;s health and happiness &#8211; to allow the rule makers and enforcers to isolate each issue from the others is one more form of divide and conquer.<br />Does anybody believe that 4 times more particluate matter will IMPROVE the quality of life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggna</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval#comment-7774</link>
		<dc:creator>ggna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=33368#comment-7774</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s how it played out at the hearing. It took 45 minutes for the language to be explained to the board and to the public. Legalese can be obtuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s how it played out at the hearing. It took 45 minutes for the language to be explained to the board and to the public. Legalese can be obtuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwyneth Doland</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval#comment-7772</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwyneth Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=33368#comment-7772</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t go to the meeting on the 12th, but my understanding is that this was a tidying of language meant to bring city wording in line with state wording and that would NOT allow an applicant to make changes outside the scope of the original permit. Am I wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t go to the meeting on the 12th, but my understanding is that this was a tidying of language meant to bring city wording in line with state wording and that would NOT allow an applicant to make changes outside the scope of the original permit. Am I wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwyneth Doland</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval#comment-7771</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwyneth Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=33368#comment-7771</guid>
		<description>Well, in this case it&#039;s pretty difficult to deny a permit because the cement company hired an environmental consulting firm to make sure they&#039;ve dotted all their i&#039;s and crossed all their t&#039;s. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And also, in a broader context, because many of the frustrations expressed by neighbors--about the noise and the traffic--may heavily impact their quality of life, but air quality is the only thing the Air Quality Division is allowed to consider when deciding whether or not to approve a permit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right now, you&#039;re pretty much right. As long as applicants can demonstrate that they&#039;re within standards, AQ&#039;s hands are tied. What could change? The standards could be tightened. Or the entire process could be changed to combine air quality, noise and traffic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in this case it&#39;s pretty difficult to deny a permit because the cement company hired an environmental consulting firm to make sure they&#39;ve dotted all their i&#39;s and crossed all their t&#39;s. </p>
<p>And also, in a broader context, because many of the frustrations expressed by neighbors&#8211;about the noise and the traffic&#8211;may heavily impact their quality of life, but air quality is the only thing the Air Quality Division is allowed to consider when deciding whether or not to approve a permit.</p>
<p>Right now, you&#39;re pretty much right. As long as applicants can demonstrate that they&#39;re within standards, AQ&#39;s hands are tied. What could change? The standards could be tightened. Or the entire process could be changed to combine air quality, noise and traffic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owinurame</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval#comment-7705</link>
		<dc:creator>Owinurame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=33368#comment-7705</guid>
		<description>I hope Ms Doland will write about the Air Quality Division&#039;s attempt to re-write the rules for public hearings and no longer require the community&#039;s input when a polluter seeks to extend hours and multiply the amount of dust by a factor of 3-5.&lt;br&gt;Exactly that proposal was made at the City-County Air Quality Control Board meeting on Aug 12th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Ms Doland will write about the Air Quality Division&#39;s attempt to re-write the rules for public hearings and no longer require the community&#39;s input when a polluter seeks to extend hours and multiply the amount of dust by a factor of 3-5.<br />Exactly that proposal was made at the City-County Air Quality Control Board meeting on Aug 12th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggna</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/33368/american-cement-permit-appears-headed-for-approval#comment-7592</link>
		<dc:creator>ggna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=33368#comment-7592</guid>
		<description>The unasked question: &quot;Why is it &#039;pretty difficult&#039; to deny a permit?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The answer: We have to wait until ambient air quality standards are so bad that *nobody* gets a permit. Until then, everybody gets their permit. It&#039;s insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The unasked question: &#8220;Why is it &#39;pretty difficult&#39; to deny a permit?&#8221;</p>
<p>The answer: We have to wait until ambient air quality standards are so bad that *nobody* gets a permit. Until then, everybody gets their permit. It&#39;s insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

