<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top lawmakers consider $77 million in education cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newmexicoindependent.com/37220/top-lawmakers-consider-77-million-in-education-cuts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/37220/top-lawmakers-consider-77-million-in-education-cuts</link>
	<description>New Mexico news and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GimmieAMilk</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/37220/top-lawmakers-consider-77-million-in-education-cuts#comment-20986</link>
		<dc:creator>GimmieAMilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=37220#comment-20986</guid>
		<description>Yesssss!  Spending almost half of the state budget on education with little-to-no accountablility and results just underscores the need to &quot;flush the toilet&quot; on public education in NM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesssss!  Spending almost half of the state budget on education with little-to-no accountablility and results just underscores the need to &#8220;flush the toilet&#8221; on public education in NM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GimmieAMilk</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/37220/top-lawmakers-consider-77-million-in-education-cuts#comment-18303</link>
		<dc:creator>GimmieAMilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=37220#comment-18303</guid>
		<description>Yesssss!  Spending almost half of the state budget on education with little-to-no accountablility and results just underscores the need to &quot;flush the toilet&quot; on public education in NM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesssss!  Spending almost half of the state budget on education with little-to-no accountablility and results just underscores the need to &#8220;flush the toilet&#8221; on public education in NM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GimmieAMilk</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/37220/top-lawmakers-consider-77-million-in-education-cuts#comment-9422</link>
		<dc:creator>GimmieAMilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=37220#comment-9422</guid>
		<description>Yesssss!  Spending almost half of the state budget on education with little-to-no accountablility and results just underscores the need to &quot;flush the toilet&quot; on public education in NM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesssss!  Spending almost half of the state budget on education with little-to-no accountablility and results just underscores the need to &#8220;flush the toilet&#8221; on public education in NM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GimmieAMilk</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/37220/top-lawmakers-consider-77-million-in-education-cuts#comment-9261</link>
		<dc:creator>GimmieAMilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=37220#comment-9261</guid>
		<description>Yesssss!  Spending almost half of the state budget on education with little-to-no accountablility and results just underscores the need to &quot;flush the toilet&quot; on public education in NM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesssss!  Spending almost half of the state budget on education with little-to-no accountablility and results just underscores the need to &#8220;flush the toilet&#8221; on public education in NM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ji8221272</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/37220/top-lawmakers-consider-77-million-in-education-cuts#comment-9208</link>
		<dc:creator>ji8221272</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=37220#comment-9208</guid>
		<description>Sen. Smith and the infamous &#039;Gang of 12&#039; are determined to continue protecting the super-rich and out-of-state corporations. Like Grover Norquist, they want to weaken New Mexico&#039;s public services to the point that someone could drown these services in a bathtub.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Sen. Smith and the Gang of 12 made cuts like this last January ($500 million deficit), and the cuts didn&#039;t solve the problem. It made the problem worse. Now, they&#039;re back with a $433 million deficit.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Lawmakers shouldn&#039;t cut public spending during a recession, period. But, Smith and the Gang of 12 are back with the more of the same LFC staff-driven ideas to cut spending which would normally end-up producing tax revenues.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;This second round of proposed cuts, if approved by the LFC on Sept. 28, and approved by a majority of lawmakers during October&#039;s special session, will continue the death-spiral of declining tax revenues in New Mexico. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If constituents don&#039;t stop lawmakers from making these cuts (a massive public demonstration is scheduled for Oct. 9 at the State Capitol), Smith and the Gang of 12 will be back in January 2010 to cut again. Now, what&#039;s the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over when it didn&#039;t work the first time?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;We believe we have little choice,&quot; says Rep. Varela. This is the greatest myth perpetrated on New Mexicans since &#039;One-hour Martinizing&#039;. There are much better choices than cutting the value of school kids again (lawmakers cut the value by $30 last session). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those better choices are rolling back tax cuts for wealthiest New Mexicans (will produce $450 million in tax revenues)and closing tax loopholes for big out-of-state corporations which do not report profits earned in New Mexico, nor pay state income taxes on those profits (will produce $100 million tax revenues). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These additional revenues could be used to restore the $30 lawmakers cut from the student value in January and prevent future student value cuts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lawmakers are between a rock and a hard place now. Most of the state&#039;s labor unions, (and a new coalition &quot;Better Choices New Mexico&quot;) are circulating petitions which support the better choices mentioned above. Thousands of New Mexicans have signed those petitions. AFT New Mexico (9,000 dues-paying members) also conducted a telephone poll recently and found that 96 percent strongly support the better choices mentioned above, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If New Mexico&#039;s lawmakers value their hobby (being an elected state senator or representative) then they best stop protecting the wealthiest New Mexicans and out-of-state orporations, and take action to produce the tax revenues necessary for sufficiently funding public schools, instead of cutting education spending. Otherwise, they will be gone come November 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Smith and the infamous &#39;Gang of 12&#39; are determined to continue protecting the super-rich and out-of-state corporations. Like Grover Norquist, they want to weaken New Mexico&#39;s public services to the point that someone could drown these services in a bathtub.</p>
<p>Sen. Smith and the Gang of 12 made cuts like this last January ($500 million deficit), and the cuts didn&#39;t solve the problem. It made the problem worse. Now, they&#39;re back with a $433 million deficit.</p>
<p>Lawmakers shouldn&#39;t cut public spending during a recession, period. But, Smith and the Gang of 12 are back with the more of the same LFC staff-driven ideas to cut spending which would normally end-up producing tax revenues.</p>
<p>This second round of proposed cuts, if approved by the LFC on Sept. 28, and approved by a majority of lawmakers during October&#39;s special session, will continue the death-spiral of declining tax revenues in New Mexico. </p>
<p>If constituents don&#39;t stop lawmakers from making these cuts (a massive public demonstration is scheduled for Oct. 9 at the State Capitol), Smith and the Gang of 12 will be back in January 2010 to cut again. Now, what&#39;s the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over when it didn&#39;t work the first time?</p>
<p>&#8220;We believe we have little choice,&#8221; says Rep. Varela. This is the greatest myth perpetrated on New Mexicans since &#39;One-hour Martinizing&#39;. There are much better choices than cutting the value of school kids again (lawmakers cut the value by $30 last session). </p>
<p>Those better choices are rolling back tax cuts for wealthiest New Mexicans (will produce $450 million in tax revenues)and closing tax loopholes for big out-of-state corporations which do not report profits earned in New Mexico, nor pay state income taxes on those profits (will produce $100 million tax revenues). </p>
<p>These additional revenues could be used to restore the $30 lawmakers cut from the student value in January and prevent future student value cuts.</p>
<p>Lawmakers are between a rock and a hard place now. Most of the state&#39;s labor unions, (and a new coalition &#8220;Better Choices New Mexico&#8221;) are circulating petitions which support the better choices mentioned above. Thousands of New Mexicans have signed those petitions. AFT New Mexico (9,000 dues-paying members) also conducted a telephone poll recently and found that 96 percent strongly support the better choices mentioned above, too.</p>
<p>If New Mexico&#39;s lawmakers value their hobby (being an elected state senator or representative) then they best stop protecting the wealthiest New Mexicans and out-of-state orporations, and take action to produce the tax revenues necessary for sufficiently funding public schools, instead of cutting education spending. Otherwise, they will be gone come November 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gshurley</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/37220/top-lawmakers-consider-77-million-in-education-cuts#comment-9073</link>
		<dc:creator>gshurley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=37220#comment-9073</guid>
		<description>...because cutting education funding is a strategy that guarantees future success of the citizens.  I mean, those greedy public schools have too much money already, so lets take it away from them and line the pockets of politicians and their business associates.....I love New Mexico!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;because cutting education funding is a strategy that guarantees future success of the citizens.  I mean, those greedy public schools have too much money already, so lets take it away from them and line the pockets of politicians and their business associates&#8230;..I love New Mexico!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

