<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote in this poll so this pollster will poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newmexicoindependent.com/42693/pollster-considering-polling-an-nm-district/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/42693/pollster-considering-polling-an-nm-district</link>
	<description>New Mexico news and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aliandra</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/42693/pollster-considering-polling-an-nm-district#comment-22157</link>
		<dc:creator>Aliandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=42693#comment-22157</guid>
		<description>Well, obviously it wants to poll the district with the most Web users. That will assure continued under-representation of rural districts, and allow machine politicians to continue carving out special exemptions, such as the exemption from electronic filing of campaign finance reports for rural candidates. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And obviously the left-leaning (there&#039;s no lean really - it&#039;s more like the left-standing...) New Mexico Independent wants to help PPP stuff the ballot boxes in its unscientific online poll so that constituents best represented on NMI - those who work for public agencies (which comprised about half of the handful of responses to NMI&#039;s recent unscientific user poll that by the way didn&#039;t ask how many readers are unemployed.) will most benefit from propaganda cranked out by the left-leaning public-opinion company.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And of course, what party are public employees most likely to support? Obviously, the one whose platform admits its purpose is to expand the government franchise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, obviously it wants to poll the district with the most Web users. That will assure continued under-representation of rural districts, and allow machine politicians to continue carving out special exemptions, such as the exemption from electronic filing of campaign finance reports for rural candidates. </p>
<p>And obviously the left-leaning (there&#39;s no lean really &#8211; it&#39;s more like the left-standing&#8230;) New Mexico Independent wants to help PPP stuff the ballot boxes in its unscientific online poll so that constituents best represented on NMI &#8211; those who work for public agencies (which comprised about half of the handful of responses to NMI&#39;s recent unscientific user poll that by the way didn&#39;t ask how many readers are unemployed.) will most benefit from propaganda cranked out by the left-leaning public-opinion company.</p>
<p>And of course, what party are public employees most likely to support? Obviously, the one whose platform admits its purpose is to expand the government franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aliandra</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/42693/pollster-considering-polling-an-nm-district#comment-19654</link>
		<dc:creator>Aliandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=42693#comment-19654</guid>
		<description>Well, obviously it wants to poll the district with the most Web users. That will assure continued under-representation of rural districts, and allow machine politicians to continue carving out special exemptions, such as the exemption from electronic filing of campaign finance reports for rural candidates. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And obviously the left-leaning (there&#039;s no lean really - it&#039;s more like the left-standing...) New Mexico Independent wants to help PPP stuff the ballot boxes in its unscientific online poll so that constituents best represented on NMI - those who work for public agencies (which comprised about half of the handful of responses to NMI&#039;s recent unscientific user poll that by the way didn&#039;t ask how many readers are unemployed.) will most benefit from propaganda cranked out by the left-leaning public-opinion company.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And of course, what party are public employees most likely to support? Obviously, the one whose platform admits its purpose is to expand the government franchise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, obviously it wants to poll the district with the most Web users. That will assure continued under-representation of rural districts, and allow machine politicians to continue carving out special exemptions, such as the exemption from electronic filing of campaign finance reports for rural candidates. </p>
<p>And obviously the left-leaning (there&#39;s no lean really &#8211; it&#39;s more like the left-standing&#8230;) New Mexico Independent wants to help PPP stuff the ballot boxes in its unscientific online poll so that constituents best represented on NMI &#8211; those who work for public agencies (which comprised about half of the handful of responses to NMI&#39;s recent unscientific user poll that by the way didn&#39;t ask how many readers are unemployed.) will most benefit from propaganda cranked out by the left-leaning public-opinion company.</p>
<p>And of course, what party are public employees most likely to support? Obviously, the one whose platform admits its purpose is to expand the government franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aliandra</title>
		<link>http://newmexicoindependent.com/42693/pollster-considering-polling-an-nm-district#comment-13402</link>
		<dc:creator>Aliandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmexicoindependent.com/?p=42693#comment-13402</guid>
		<description>Well, obviously it wants to poll the district with the most Web users. That will assure continued under-representation of rural districts, and allow machine politicians to continue carving out special exemptions, such as the exemption from electronic filing of campaign finance reports for rural candidates. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And obviously the left-leaning (there&#039;s no lean really - it&#039;s more like the left-standing...) New Mexico Independent wants to help PPP stuff the ballot boxes in its unscientific online poll so that constituents best represented on NMI - those who work for public agencies (which comprised about half of the handful of responses to NMI&#039;s recent unscientific user poll that by the way didn&#039;t ask how many readers are unemployed.) will most benefit from propaganda cranked out by the left-leaning public-opinion company.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And of course, what party are public employees most likely to support? Obviously, the one whose platform admits its purpose is to expand the government franchise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, obviously it wants to poll the district with the most Web users. That will assure continued under-representation of rural districts, and allow machine politicians to continue carving out special exemptions, such as the exemption from electronic filing of campaign finance reports for rural candidates. </p>
<p>And obviously the left-leaning (there&#39;s no lean really &#8211; it&#39;s more like the left-standing&#8230;) New Mexico Independent wants to help PPP stuff the ballot boxes in its unscientific online poll so that constituents best represented on NMI &#8211; those who work for public agencies (which comprised about half of the handful of responses to NMI&#39;s recent unscientific user poll that by the way didn&#39;t ask how many readers are unemployed.) will most benefit from propaganda cranked out by the left-leaning public-opinion company.</p>
<p>And of course, what party are public employees most likely to support? Obviously, the one whose platform admits its purpose is to expand the government franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

