I am writing today to announce the closure of the New Mexico Independent. After three and a half years of operation in New Mexico, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news…
While environmental activists played their part yesterday during demonstrations at the capitol building, going so far as to dress up as solar panels and to sing the tune of “You Are My Sunshine,” their counterparts, the anti-cap-and-trade contingency who has…
Roughly one quarter of University of New Mexico students are unimpressed with the state’s flagship public school, according to a survey that questioned college students about their higher education experiences.
As New Mexico grapples with the largest budget deficit anyone seems to remember, the federal budgeting process for next fiscal year is about to get underway. It’s possible that there will be more state fiscal relief or other measures that would funnel resources to states or municipalities to create jobs. But reform measures currently pending at the federal level could also save money that can then be redirected to the states. One such piece of federal legislation, passed by the House in September but now languishing–along with tons of other legislation–in the Senate, is the Student Aid Fiscal Responsibility Act, or SAFRA.
While it’s a higher education student aid reform measure, some of the public savings from passage of SAFRA would be funneled into an early childhood education competitive grant program for the states.
“New Mexico is on the cusp of creating a really world class early childhood system, and these types of grants are just the kind of federal support we need,” Bill Jordan, policy director for New Mexico Voices for Children, told The Independent.
Basically, SAFRA would restructure how higher education student loans are originated. Currently, banks and other types of private lending institutions give the loans, with the federal government providing both a guarantee that the loan will be paid back, and in some cases a subsidy that covers the interest on the loan owed to the banks. President Obama has proposed to shift the administration of the loans from the private sector to the federal government, a move that the Congressional Budget Office estimates would save $87 billion over 10 years.
Those funds would be used to expand access to college, and to provide $8-$10 billion in early childhood education competitive grants to the states through the “early learning challenge fund.”
SAFRA has it’s detractors, captured rather succintly in the title of a piece called “Safra Stinks” from the Cato Institute. The conservative think tank’s take is that federal direct lending of student loan programs would lead to too many student loans being given out. And of course, the move would end a profitable market for private lending institutions.
But in any event, its one example of the kinds of things happening at the federal level outside of the federal stimulus program and the budgeting process that could lead to more dollars coming our way.
