It hasn't been a good year for energy companies looking to develop new oil and gas fields in northern New Mexico. Three months ago, the Santa Fe County Commission voted unanimously to prohibit drilling in the Galisteo Basin for at least a year. And the Rio Arriba County Commission did the same thing last month -- unanimously approving a four-month ban on new oil and gas drilling in the county.
Now, at least one of the affected energy companies is taking the fight to court. Texas-based Approach Resources has filed a federal suit challenging Rio Arriba County's moratorium, the Albuquerque Journal is reporting this morning.
Approach Resources, which wanted to begin exploring for oil east of Tierra Amarilla next month, argues that the moratorium violates its property rights and could cost the company tens of millions of dollars, according to the Journal.
Energy producers in San Juan County, Rio Arriba's neighbor, would provides many of the workers who would drill the wells and have said the moratorium will "cripple the local economy," the Farmington Daily Times reported last month.
But the Rio Arriba County Commission wanted some time to mull environmental concerns:
Despite industry comment about the financial effects it would suffer from a moratorium, Rio Arriba County Manager Lorenzo J. Valdez said pain is not the point, that it's all about protecting Rio Arriba County's prime feature -- its land, the Daily Times reported.
The same kind of concerns lead to the ban in Santa Fe County, where Tecton Energy wants to drill for oil and gas in the Galisteo Basin south of Santa Fe. Now the question is whether Tecton will follow in Approach Resources' footsteps. Tecton has previously threatened legal action, but so far has not filed suit.
Comments:
Posted 06/04/2008 01:24 with
For the past 25 years, I have noticed some things:
1. We, the tax paying citizens, have and are going to be paying for the restoration of air, water, and general environment of anywhere that Oil, Gas, Mining and Nuclear energy has been active. Anyone can notice signs of the “Environmental Cleanup at this site by” either the EPA, Your Federal government, or your state and Federal Government (we the taxpayers). We can also name sites that need to be cleaned up but are not yet cleaned up after the oil, gas mining and nuclear activities have left the site for other locations.
2. Our Federal and sometimes our State Government subsides the costs of energy produced by oil, gas, mining, and nuclear energy producers for the good of the consumer (we the taxpayer).
3. Our Federal and State and sometimes Local Government form special governmental agencies which regulate, monitor, and enforce, and watchdog the, distribution, and storage methods, standards, and consumer prices charged by oil, gas, mining, and nuclear energy production (we the taxpayers pay for these added government agencies).
4. Our Federal and State governments spend legislative time creating laws to allow the taxpayers to reclaim some costs which they feel need to be lower by increasing the tax codes to give back some of the taxes or costs which impact business greatly.
5. Our Federal government gives excessive credits and grants to the producers to insure or enlarge the profits of an industry that is supposed to be an independent profitable company.
During this same quarter of a century, PNM has
Similar problems of increased infrastructure and Maintience accompany the needs for oil, gas, nuclear energies.
Comparatively
Compare all of the environmental and dollar costs of my stand alone system to the total costs of the Grid including building it, maintaining it, distributing it, and the toxic clean up costs.
My stand alone system needs fewer repairs. I am the only person affected if it goes down.
My stand alone system costs for Maintience and additional service are costs for only me.
My stand alone system does not have to have a hardship subsidy for the poor by the government.
My stand alone system provides electricity with no environmental problems to anyone or for any governmental regulation, monitoring or oversight. (a large governmental savings)
All central energy systems are susceptible to terrorists: a stand alone single system is not worth terrorist actions.
Stand alone systems allow population freedom of growth unlimited by existing infrastructure and not costing additional regulation and maintience burdens.
Stand alone systems can grow with a home allowing for enlarging it as the need arrives.
Allow alternative energy one sixth of the financial incentives that are given to oil and see what will happen in 6 months time.
ANY MONEY SPENT ON GAS OR OIL PRODUCTION, DELAYS ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AS WELL AS BRINGS US ADDED GOVERNMENT AND ADDED COSTS IN MONITORING ALL OF THE DANGEROUR ACTIONS OF THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY.
WE ARE NOW PAYING and WILL CONTINUE TO PAY TO CLEAN UP COSTS LEFT BY OIL, GAS, NUCLEAR AND MINING IN THE FUTURE. I am tired of paying for their messes. With the changing economy, I may not be financially able to pay for the clean up in the future.
OIL, GAS, NUCLEAR, AND MINING DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE AND POLUTE WATER. PERIOD! If they want to be responsible, let them find ways of extraction that will not jeopardize life and water. Water belongs to the whole planet not just the human population. They may have the mineral rights, but they do not have the water rights, the air rights, the environmental rights. They can not be allowed to use and destroy what they do not own.